A questa domanda rispondono due scrittori.
Adam Kirsch: "Spectacle and melodrama remain at the heart of TV, as they do with all arts that must reach a large audience in order to be economically viable. But it is voice, tone, the sense of the author’s mind at work, that are the essence of literature, and they exist in language, not in images. This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be grateful for our good TV shows; but let’s not fool ourselves into thinking that they give us what only literature can".
Adam Kirsch: "Spectacle and melodrama remain at the heart of TV, as they do with all arts that must reach a large audience in order to be economically viable. But it is voice, tone, the sense of the author’s mind at work, that are the essence of literature, and they exist in language, not in images. This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be grateful for our good TV shows; but let’s not fool ourselves into thinking that they give us what only literature can".
Mohsin Hamid: "I
now watch a lot of TV. And I’m not alone, even among my colleagues. Ask
novelists today whether they spend more time watching TV or reading
fiction and prepare yourself, at least occasionally, to hear them say
the unsayable.
That
this represents a crisis for the novel seems to me undeniable. But a
crisis can be an opportunity. It incites change. And the novel needs to
keep changing if it is to remain novel. It must, pilfering a phrase from
TV, boldly go where no one has gone before. nytbr.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento